Action & AdventureAction ThrillersAnimeAnime & AnimationBrazilBritish MoviesChildren & FamilyChildren & Family MoviesClassic MoviesClassical MusicClassicsComediesComedyDocumentariesDocumentaryDramaDramasDramas based on real lifeFaith & SpiritualityFaith and SpiritualityForeignForeign MoviesForeign MusicalsFrench MoviesGay & LesbianGay & Lesbian MoviesGerman MoviesHorrorHorror MoviesIndependentIndependent MoviesIndian MoviesJapanese MoviesMartial Arts, Boxing & WrestlingMiddle Eastern MoviesMusicMusic & MusicalsMusicalsNew Zealand MoviesRomanceRomantic MoviesSci-Fi & FantasyScience & Nature DocumentariesSoutheast Asian MoviesSpecial InterestSports & FitnessTelevisionThrillersTravel & Adventure DocumentariesTV Shows
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synopsis: "The first installment of the two-part conclusion to the Harry Potter series finds the bespectacled wizard (Daniel Radcliffe) walking away from his last year at Hogwarts to find and destroy the remaining Horcruxes, putting an end to Voldemort's bid for immortality. But with Harry's beloved Dumbledore dead and Voldemort's unscrupulous Death Eaters on the loose, the world is more dangerous than ever." "ole mcdonald had a farm,e-i-e-i (annoyed grunt)""My dad and I both agree it's boring,innapropiate(I'll talk about the innapropriateness later) and too darn long. I'm used to 135 minutes of boring screenplay, but 145 is tedious. I'll admit when I left the theater, I did love the movie. But still, none of it takes place at hogwarts. It's innapropriate because of the sex scene. It is (sadly) just an illusion set up by the hocrux to distract Ron, but still. My main problem is it's too long. It's like "Titanic." 2 hours into the movie your like 'Just sink already.Stupid boat.' But it takes too long to get to the point. So it deserves 3 stars." by jacobatthemovies on Tue Oct 11th, 2011 0 Comments | Reply | Report""Slow with no climax"""The long and forever memorable Harry Potter franchise is coming to an end. Being the first part of the last movie I expected more. It was slow and the story for me never really reached a climax. The whole 146 minutes was a very magical experience but it was at times boring. There were some fight scenes and parts with suspense. It had a interesting ending that kept me hanging and wanting to see part 2. The reason that I gave it four stars was because I love the franchise. If you like Harry Potter go and see this but don't get your hopes up." by puakoboy14 on Sun Jul 3rd, 2011 0 Comments | Reply | Report"Im glad""I love Harry Potter. Im a huge Harry nerd. Ive read all the books and seen all the movies. I was disappointed with the 5th movie and only satisfied with the 6th but this one was by far excellent. I was very happy with it and how it followed the book. 1 through 4 were very good and i was mad about the 5th and somewhat 6th but they did more than good with this one. It was suspensful and had many plots and the charachters had much to do and go through to accomplish goals. There was a lot of action, sadness, and some happy moments. The acting was great as usual and the romance between Grint and Watsons charachters sizzled in this movie. I cant wait to see part two and im sad that this series will then be done." by Lmason2495i on Mon Jun 6th, 2011 0 Comments | Reply | Report"One of the best!""This is one of the best Harry Potter movies. The time is about 2 hours... It felt like 30 minutes. When it was over I couldn't wait to see part II. This movie is extraordinary!" by tmbowe on Mon May 2nd, 2011 0 Comments | Reply | Report"Harry Potter, he's magic!""I think that it is a very good film, it keeps to the book better than the other films. However I think that they director hasn't left that much more of the book to make a decent film out of it (Harry Potter part 2). The actors are all very good at their character and they suit them very well. I can't wait to watch the next film which come out in July 2011! :D" by Billybob on Sun Apr 17th, 2011 0 Comments | Reply | Report"Only one more to go""It is hard to rate and review these movies after awhile. There are so many and some I loved while others I didn't. One thing is that every new movie there is something different they try and it either wins or fails. This movie had both. The win was focusing on the main characters more as grown ups than as kids and it really worked. I felt like I was watching more of an adult fantasy type movie. The fail was the use of action scenes. They tried the whole, "shaking the camera" to add special effect and more of the real to the action shots. This really took away from the film and even started giving me a headache. I am glad it was not in 3D because I probably would of passed out. The cast was still great and Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson blossom with each movie. The rest of the characters are fun to watch as always and a joy to see act. This film is darker than most of the other movies and did have some more passion towards characters too. So I did enjoy how it was filmed, but not the shaking camera. One more Harry Potter to go and it is over. Hopefully it will end and it will be a good end to a great series and everyone can focus on something new." by chelano on Thu Dec 2nd, 2010 0 Comments | Reply | Report |
Today's HottestIn the Box Office
Most Recently Discussed
Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011)
13 reviews, 7 comments. The Devil Inside (2012)13 reviews, 0 comments. The Hunger Games (2012)10 reviews, 0 comments. The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn: Part 1 (2011)13 reviews, 0 comments. Drive (2011)16 reviews, 0 comments. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Pa ... (2011)29 reviews, 0 comments. Hugo (2011)8 reviews, 4 comments. Act of Valor (2012)7 reviews, 0 comments. » More Recent Reviews |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© Copyright 2012 Digimedia.com, L.P. · Terms & Conditions · Privacy · Changelog | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RegisterNew users register for free below to instantly post! |
LoginExisting users log in below to review. |